← 返回目录

房屋销售比较

Home Sales Comparison
数据图小作文
🏷️ 数据图📋 ID: 025📝 词数 176

📝 题目

The chart below shows the number of houses sold for over 5 million US dollars in eight different cities between 2009 and 2014.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

房屋销售比较

✍️ 参考范文

The bar chart illustrates the quantity of residences sold for more than 5 million US dollars across eight major cities in 2009 and 2014.

Overall, sales of these high-value properties rose in all cities except Singapore over the period. London recorded by far the highest number of such home sales in both years, while Dubai had the lowest figures.

In detail, London saw the most dramatic growth, with ultra-luxury home sales more than tripling from 523 in 2009 to 1638 in 2014, making it the clear leader. New York and Hong Kong also saw significant rises, from 476 to 796 and 388 to 596 respectively. The remaining cities with growing sales had far smaller volumes: Miami’s figure grew from 256 to 312, Los Angeles from 178 to 214, and Sydney from 151 to 258. Dubai, despite having the smallest sales count in 2009 at just 12, saw its figure nearly quadruple to 46 in 2014. By contrast, Singapore was the only city where luxury home sales fell, dropping from 107 to 74 over the five-year period.

审题与结构规划
本题为雅思写作Part 1动态柱状图,要求对比8个城市2009、2014年价值超过500万美元的房产销量。写作结构遵循标准Part 1框架:开头段改写题目,概述段总结最核心的整体趋势与极值特征,主体段分细节对比数据。
整体趋势
除新加坡外,所有城市该类高端房产销量均上升。
极值特征
伦敦在两年中都是销量最高的城市,且涨幅最大;迪拜两年都是销量最低的城市之一。
特殊数据
新加坡是唯一销量下降的城市;伦敦的2014年销量远超所有其他城市。
开头段
改写题干,替换关键词showsillustrateshousesresidencesover 5 million US dollarsmore than 5 million US dollars,明确对比维度和时间。
概述段
首先点明整体趋势(仅新加坡下降,其余全部上升),再点明两个极值(伦敦销量最高,迪拜最低),覆盖最宏观的特征。
首先描述排名最靠前、涨幅最大的伦敦,突出其远超其他城市的领先地位,给出具体数据。
接着描述第二梯队的纽约、香港,说明二者的显著增长及对应数值。
之后归总描述迈阿密、洛杉矶、悉尼三个中等规模销量城市的小幅增长。
最后描述两个特殊低值城市
迪拜的低基数高涨幅,以及唯一出现销量下降的新加坡的具体数据,完成所有城市的对比覆盖。
语言与表达
使用多样化的趋势表达(rosemore than triplingsignificant risesgrewnearly quadruplefell/dropping),避免重复;使用逻辑衔接词(OverallIn detailBy contrast)串联内容;所有数据准确对应,对比清晰,符合雅思Part 1评分标准。