← 返回目录

学生满意度评价

Student Satisfaction Ratings
数据图小作文
🏷️ 数据图📋 ID: 012📝 词数 201

📝 题目

The table below shows the percentage of first-year students who gave a “very good” rating to the resources provided by a college for three courses.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

学生满意度评价

✍️ 参考范文

The table compares the proportions of first-year students who rated five different college resources as “very good” for three courses: Economics, Law, and Commerce.

Overall, Commerce received the highest satisfaction ratings across almost all listed resources, while Economics and Law each had particularly low ratings for different categories. Teaching and tutor support generally earned the most positive feedback, whereas pre-course information and other resources had more varied scores.

Looking at the highest-rated categories first, 95% of Economics and Commerce students rated teaching quality as very good, compared to only 62% of Law students. Tutor support followed a similar trend: 93% of Commerce students and 90% of Economics students gave a positive rating, while the figure for Law was 76%. Print resources also received relatively good ratings across the board, from 70% for Law to 85% for Commerce.

There were bigger differences in the remaining two resources. Commerce had by far the best rating for pre-course information at 95%, followed by Law at 72%, while Economics had the lowest figure at 59%. In contrast, other resources were rated most highly by Law students (80%) and Commerce students (81%), with only 60% of Economics students giving a very good rating in this area.

审题与结构规划
本题为雅思小作文静态表格题,写作要求是总结主要特征并做相关对比,因此需要按“开头改写题目-概述整体趋势-分组对比细节”的结构写作,避免罗列所有数据,而是提炼核心对比项。
开头段处理
对原题题干进行同义改写,把“shows the percentage of”替换为“compares the proportions of”,“gave a very good rating”替换为“rated...as very good”,清晰说明表格对比的三个课程和五类资源,完成题目引入。
概述段(overview)写作
首先总结整体最高/最低特征:Commerce几乎所有资源评分都最高,Economics和Law各有低分项;再总结类别的整体规律:教学和导师辅导整体评分最高,课前信息和其他资源评分差异较大,符合小作文overview必须总结核心趋势、不出现具体数据的要求。
细节段分组对比
第一组对比高评分的同类项:教学质量、导师支持、印刷资源这三类整体评分较高的项,横向对比三个课程的数值,指出Economics和Commerce教学评分并列最高(95%),Law教学评分最低;导师评分和印刷资源也按相同趋势对比,逻辑连贯。 第二组对比差异大的项:课前信息和其他资源,分别对比三个课程的数值,指出Commerce课前信息评分最高、Economics最低;其他资源则是Economics评分远低于另外两个课程,清晰体现数据间的对比关系。
内容检查
没有冗余信息,所有数据都为核心对比服务,完成了题目要求的总结特征和对比的任务。