← 返回目录

剧院意见调查

Theatre Opinions Survey
数据图小作文
🏷️ 数据图📋 ID: 005📝 词数 201

📝 题目

The table below shows questionnaires about the opinions of club members and the general public about the new theatre in one town in 2012.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

剧院意见调查

✍️ 参考范文

The table presents results from a 2012 survey measuring club members' and the general public's satisfaction levels with three aspects of a town's new theatre: facilities, information provision, and production quality, using three ratings: Excellent, Satisfied, Poor.

Overall, club members were more positive about the theatre’s facilities and show quality than the general public, while non-members were more satisfied with the information provided. Poor ratings were the least common across all categories for both groups.

To be specific, theatre quality was the most highly rated aspect among club members, with 88% rating it Excellent, and only 2% giving a Poor rating, while just 53% of the general public rated quality as Excellent, and 7% thought it Poor. For facilities, club members also gave higher positive ratings: 72% rated them Excellent compared to 64% of the public, and only 2% of members rated facilities Poor, four times lower than the public’s figure of 8%.

By contrast, information about the theatre was the only area where the general public held more positive views, with 66% rating it Excellent against 54% of club members. The share of dissatisfied respondents for information was also similar, at 14% for the public and 16% for club members.

任务理解
本题为雅思写作Part1静态表格题,写作核心是总结2012年某城镇新剧院的两类受访群体(俱乐部会员、普通公众)对三个维度的满意度差异,需要先提炼核心整体特征,再分组对比关键数据,覆盖最高值、最低值和组间差异。
开头段
改写题目,介绍表格核心内容,即调查的时间、对象、评估维度和评分等级。
总体概述段
提炼两个核心特征:一是会员对设施和演出质量的好评率更高,普通公众对剧院信息的满意度更高;二是差评在所有类别中占比都最低。
细节段1
首先对比演出质量维度,这是两个群体满意度差异最大的部分,会员的"Excellent"占比高达88%,差评仅2%,远高于普通公众的53%好评率;再对比设施维度,会员好评率72%,差评率仅2%,也优于普通公众的64%好评率、8%差评率。
细节段2
最后对比信息维度,这是唯一普通公众好评率(66%)高于会员(54%)的项目,两者差评率非常接近,分别为14%和16%。
要点选择
优先选取差异最大的极值数据(会员对质量88%的最高好评率、信息项的反向满意度差异),对比关键数值的倍数/差距,避免罗列所有数据,符合Part1"筛选关键特征、做相关对比"的评分要求。
逻辑衔接
使用overall、to be specific、by contrast等连接词衔接段落,清晰呈现总-分逻辑,数据对比准确,覆盖所有三个评估维度和两类受访群体,没有遗漏核心信息。